Figure J. Distribution of Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) of Azithromycin among GISP Isolates, 2008-2012
CLINIC
Azithromycin
% of isolates
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
ALBUQUERQUE
<=0.03
.
13.5
20.0
26.3
13.2
0.06
5.9
24.0
22.9
29.6
17.1
0.125
25.5
33.3
21.9
18.4
32.2
0.25
39.2
19.8
13.3
15.1
19.7
0.5
27.5
8.3
18.1
7.9
14.5
1.0
2.0
1.0
1.9
2.6
3.3
2.0
.
.
1.9
.
.
ATLANTA
<=0.03
.
24.6
19.2
26.7
23.5
0.06
3.8
24.6
23.0
22.0
18.8
0.125
13.0
43.5
38.0
26.7
31.8
0.25
44.0
5.6
13.9
14.8
17.3
0.5
32.6
0.9
5.2
9.4
8.7
1.0
6.5
0.9
0.7
0.4
.
BALTIMORE
<=0.03
0.3
1.8
1.2
1.4
1.0
0.06
4.7
7.6
5.3
10.6
7.7
0.125
21.5
21.0
23.0
27.6
25.7
0.25
45.5
47.8
46.3
45.4
46.0
0.5
22.9
20.7
20.5
15.0
19.3
1.0
5.1
1.1
3.7
.
0.3
BIRMINGHAM
<=0.03
.
0.5
4.9
3.8
2.7
0.06
1.7
12.4
3.8
13.7
10.7
0.125
10.4
23.0
22.2
32.1
36.0
0.25
40.4
42.6
43.6
46.2
40.7
0.5
43.3
20.6
19.5
4.2
9.7
1.0
4.2
1.0
6.0
.
.
>=4.0
.
.
.
.
0.3
CHICAGO
<=0.03
6.1
4.7
0.8
3.0
2.5
0.06
3.4
6.8
5.6
3.3
5.5
0.125
11.1
13.6
9.6
17.8
20.7
0.25
43.1
43.0
41.6
39.4
29.5
0.5
27.9
25.5
30.4
29.4
32.7
1.0
8.0
6.0
10.4
6.7
8.4
2.0
.
0.4
.
.
.
>=4.0
0.4
.
1.6
0.4
0.7
CLEVELAND
<=0.03
3.3
6.4
0.5
2.0
1.7
0.06
4.5
3.8
6.6
6.9
14.3
0.125
12.3
25.1
10.4
9.3
20.6
0.25
44.9
37.9
38.2
32.4
32.0
0.5
30.0
25.1
40.1
41.7
30.9
1.0
4.9
1.7
4.2
7.8
0.6
COLUMBUS
0.06
.
.
.
.
8.8
0.125
.
.
.
.
15.0
0.25
.
.
.
.
58.4
0.5
.
.
.
.
16.8
1.0
.
.
.
.
0.9
DALLAS
<=0.03
19.3
17.7
34.1
19.5
10.6
0.06
20.0
19.7
25.3
27.7
11.0
0.125
33.9
34.3
33.4
41.2
41.3
0.25
23.1
24.0
5.1
11.2
30.7
0.5
3.1
3.3
2.0
0.4
4.6
1.0
0.7
1.0
.
.
1.1
2.0
.
.
.
.
0.4
>=4.0
.
.
.
.
0.4
DENVER
<=0.03
13.1
29.1
43.9
12.8
2.1
0.06
17.9
15.7
16.7
17.6
7.3
0.125
38.1
18.3
28.9
33.7
31.1
0.25
18.3
28.7
6.7
23.5
52.3
0.5
6.7
7.4
3.3
10.2
7.3
1.0
6.0
0.9
0.4
1.6
.
2.0
.
.
.
0.5
.
GREENSBORO
<=0.03
1.2
19.4
15.3
25.2
21.6
0.06
4.8
8.8
15.9
18.7
11.8
0.125
10.2
23.8
36.0
28.0
32.4
0.25
59.9
24.4
24.3
21.5
24.5
0.5
21.0
20.0
8.5
6.1
8.8
1.0
3.0
3.8
.
0.5
1.0
HONOLULU
<=0.03
7.6
10.8
10.3
6.6
6.1
0.06
19.0
17.6
14.1
13.1
13.3
0.125
15.2
16.2
35.9
31.1
14.3
0.25
30.4
17.6
25.6
41.0
32.7
0.5
21.5
28.4
9.0
8.2
27.6
1.0
2.5
8.1
2.6
.
4.1
2.0
.
.
.
.
1.0
>=4.0
3.8
1.4
2.6
.
1.0
KANSAS CITY
<=0.03
2.8
6.3
.
1.3
0.7
0.06
5.2
6.3
6.3
1.3
9.0
0.125
18.7
13.7
9.3
13.0
21.7
0.25
39.3
53.3
44.7
38.7
41.3
0.5
25.0
19.0
37.3
41.3
26.0
1.0
8.3
1.3
2.3
4.3
1.3
>=4.0
0.8
.
.
.
.
LAS VEGAS
<=0.03
4.0
6.0
2.0
1.7
7.1
0.06
7.3
6.3
5.3
5.2
7.5
0.125
14.3
13.3
10.7
17.9
26.5
0.25
30.7
42.0
34.0
33.3
37.5
0.5
31.3
24.7
34.0
29.2
19.0
1.0
12.3
7.3
14.0
12.4
2.0
2.0
.
0.3
.
0.3
.
>=4.0
.
.
.
.
0.4
LOS ANGELES
<=0.03
4.8
11.0
18.2
7.5
3.4
0.06
5.6
13.8
14.0
14.4
8.1
0.125
30.4
16.7
35.2
32.2
24.8
0.25
44.0
31.9
18.2
40.2
36.9
0.5
14.4
22.4
11.0
5.7
25.5
1.0
0.8
3.8
2.3
.
0.7
2.0
.
.
.
.
0.7
>=4.0
.
0.5
1.1
.
.
MIAMI
<=0.03
1.5
3.2
23.4
30.2
29.3
0.06
5.4
16.9
20.1
17.3
18.6
0.125
15.8
26.0
25.4
18.5
21.8
0.25
52.9
23.3
18.7
17.9
15.4
0.5
20.1
23.3
8.1
12.3
12.2
1.0
4.2
7.3
2.9
3.7
2.7
2.0
.
.
1.4
.
.
MINNEAPOLIS
<=0.03
1.1
1.6
2.8
2.1
2.6
0.06
2.7
4.1
5.6
2.1
7.7
0.125
10.9
10.6
12.7
8.5
12.8
0.25
29.9
38.2
28.2
34.0
28.2
0.5
38.0
34.1
31.0
34.0
43.6
1.0
17.4
11.4
16.9
19.1
3.8
2.0
.
.
.
.
1.3
>=4.0
.
.
2.8
.
.
NEW ORLEANS
<=0.03
1.7
24.8
17.7
21.8
17.7
0.06
8.0
16.9
12.8
29.8
12.8
0.125
14.9
28.9
33.3
21.8
41.9
0.25
52.6
19.8
22.6
14.9
21.7
0.5
18.9
6.6
13.2
9.7
4.9
1.0
4.0
2.9
0.4
2.0
1.0
NEW YORK CITY
<=0.03
0.8
10.6
15.2
21.8
12.0
0.06
1.6
13.4
9.6
14.4
17.5
0.125
19.5
28.5
35.9
21.8
24.6
0.25
32.5
25.7
20.2
28.7
31.1
0.5
36.6
19.6
16.2
11.6
13.1
1.0
8.1
2.2
3.0
1.4
1.1
2.0
.
.
.
0.5
0.5
>=4.0
0.8
.
.
.
.
OKLAHOMA CITY
<=0.03
1.7
0.8
2.6
7.7
8.8
0.06
3.8
5.1
13.7
10.1
10.3
0.125
20.8
22.8
27.9
33.7
42.3
0.25
45.7
50.8
37.8
42.6
29.4
0.5
26.6
18.1
16.7
4.7
8.8
1.0
1.4
2.4
1.3
1.2
0.5
ORANGE COUNTY
<=0.03
.
1.2
1.0
0.9
3.2
0.06
3.4
1.2
1.9
9.3
14.5
0.125
8.0
3.7
3.8
12.1
16.1
0.25
20.7
12.2
15.4
26.2
33.1
0.5
50.6
53.7
49.0
48.6
29.8
1.0
17.2
26.8
26.9
2.8
3.2
2.0
.
.
1.0
.
.
>=4.0
.
1.2
1.0
.
.
PHILADELPHIA
<=0.03
.
.
1.4
0.3
2.0
0.06
4.3
1.5
5.1
5.2
6.0
0.125
9.1
15.0
11.1
25.7
20.7
0.25
33.2
36.9
40.2
45.5
49.7
0.5
43.5
35.9
33.4
22.6
19.3
1.0
9.5
10.7
8.8
0.7
2.0
2.0
0.4
.
.
.
.
>=4.0
.
.
.
.
0.3
PHOENIX
<=0.03
2.8
1.3
1.5
1.0
2.7
0.06
10.9
7.0
5.0
4.7
6.7
0.125
9.3
9.3
7.0
11.3
19.7
0.25
29.0
34.4
26.6
28.0
44.0
0.5
33.5
35.7
42.2
38.7
23.7
1.0
13.7
11.5
15.6
15.0
3.0
2.0
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.7
0.3
>=4.0
0.4
0.4
1.5
0.7
.
PONTIAC
<=0.03
.
.
.
.
5.2
0.06
.
.
.
.
5.2
0.125
.
.
.
.
20.1
0.25
.
.
.
.
53.6
0.5
.
.
.
.
11.9
1.0
.
.
.
.
3.6
2.0
.
.
.
.
0.5
PORTLAND
<=0.03
6.4
3.8
8.5
3.6
4.3
0.06
5.1
8.6
9.4
5.4
9.6
0.125
17.8
13.3
34.9
18.0
26.1
0.25
34.4
34.3
34.0
59.9
16.5
0.5
33.8
32.4
13.2
10.8
38.3
1.0
2.5
7.6
.
0.6
4.3
>=4.0
.
.
.
1.8
0.9
RICHMOND
<=0.03
0.8
.
7.1
.
5.0
0.06
3.2
6.5
7.1
3.4
20.0
0.125
22.6
25.8
28.6
13.8
25.0
0.25
39.5
41.9
35.7
31.0
40.0
0.5
29.8
22.6
21.4
44.8
10.0
1.0
4.0
3.2
.
6.9
.
SAN DIEGO
<=0.03
.
.
0.5
1.0
2.0
0.06
1.1
5.8
2.4
9.0
8.3
0.125
5.5
5.2
6.3
8.1
13.2
0.25
29.1
23.3
15.6
35.7
34.1
0.5
44.5
43.0
56.1
41.4
37.1
1.0
19.8
19.8
16.6
3.8
5.4
2.0
.
.
0.5
1.0
.
>=4.0
.
2.9
2.0
.
.
SAN FRANCISCO
<=0.03
2.4
12.3
10.9
7.5
.
0.06
11.4
6.2
16.5
7.5
4.7
0.125
21.8
15.8
43.0
42.0
24.4
0.25
36.5
33.1
20.4
37.7
44.2
0.5
25.1
28.8
8.3
4.7
22.9
1.0
2.4
3.8
0.4
.
3.9
2.0
0.5
.
.
.
.
>=4.0
.
.
0.4
0.5
.
SEATTLE
<=0.03
4.9
11.7
8.4
15.0
2.7
0.06
25.2
7.4
18.5
9.6
15.4
0.125
27.0
33.3
16.8
22.8
16.1
0.25
22.1
30.9
43.7
44.3
36.2
0.5
17.8
11.1
11.3
7.2
26.2
1.0
3.1
5.6
0.8
0.6
3.4
2.0
.
.
0.4
.
.
>=4.0
.
.
.
0.6
.
TRIPLER
<=0.03
.
33.3
50.0
.
14.3
0.06
.
16.7
.
33.3
28.6
0.125
.
16.7
50.0
33.3
28.6
0.25
.
16.7
.
33.3
21.4
0.5
.
16.7
.
.
7.1
Syndicated Content Details:
Source URL:
http://www.cdc.gov/STD/gisp2012/figJ.htm
Source Agency:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
Captured Date: 2016-05-23 22:48:42.0
Terms of Use
|
Privacy Policy
©2017 ARCHES Technology. All Rights Reserved.