Sodium Intake Among U.S. Adults — 26 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2013
Jing Fang, MD1; Mary E. Cogswell, DrPH1; Soyoun Park, PhD1; Sandra L. Jackson, PhD1; Erika C. Odom, PhD1 (Author affiliations at end of text)
Excess sodium intake is a major risk factor for hypertension, and subsequently, heart disease and stroke, the first and fifth leading causes of U.S. deaths, respectively (1). During 2011–2012, the average daily sodium intake among U.S. adults was estimated to be 3,592 mg (2), above the Healthy People 2020 target of 2,300 mg (3). To support strategies to reduce dietary sodium intake, 2013 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data from states and territories that implemented the new sodium-related behavior module were assessed. Across 26 states, the District of Columbia (DC), and Puerto Rico, 39%–73% of adults reported taking action (i.e., watching or reducing sodium intake) (median = 51%), and 14%–41% reported receiving advice from a health professional to reduce sodium intake (median = 22%). Compared with adults without hypertension, a higher percentage of adults with self-reported hypertension reported taking action and receiving advice to reduce sodium intake. For states that implemented the module, these results can serve as a baseline to monitor the effects of programs designed to reduce sodium intake.
BRFSS is an annual, random-digit–dialed telephone survey representative of noninstitutionalized, civilian adults aged =18 years in each U.S. state and territory. Detailed information on the survey is available at http://www.cdc.gov/brfss. In 2013, 26 states, DC, and Puerto Rico implemented the new, optional sodium-related behavior module. The median American Association of Public Opinion Research location-specific response rate was 48.1% (range = 31.1%–60.3%) (4).
Taking action to reduce sodium intake was defined by a "yes" response to the question, "Are you currently watching or reducing your sodium or salt intake?" Receiving health professional advice to reduce sodium intake was defined by a "yes" response to the question, "Has a doctor or other health professional ever advised you to reduce sodium or salt intake?" Self-reported hypertension was defined by a "yes" response to the question, "Have you ever been told by a doctor, nurse, or other health professional that you have high blood pressure?" The percentage of respondents taking action or receiving advice to reduce sodium intake was estimated for each state overall and by self-reported hypertension status. All estimates were age-standardized using the 2000 U.S. standard projected population. States were categorized in quartiles based on age-standardized proportions of respondents reporting taking action to reduce sodium intake and on proportions reporting having received advice to reduce sodium intake.
A total of 185,463 participants answered questions from the optional sodium module. After excluding 5,396 participants with missing information on key variables, 180,067 participants were included. State sample sizes ranged from 3,332 (Massachusetts) to 12,363 (Minnesota). The proportion of respondents who reported taking action to reduce sodium intake ranged from 38.7% (Utah) to 73.4% (Puerto Rico), with a median of 50.6% (Table 1). Across all participating locations, a higher proportion of participants with hypertension reported taking action to reduce sodium intake compared with those without hypertension (p<0.001 for all comparisons) (Table 1).
The proportion of participants who reported receiving advice from a health professional to reduce sodium intake ranged from 13.5% (Minnesota) to 41.4% (Puerto Rico), with a median of 21.1%. Across all locations, a higher proportion of participants with hypertension reported receiving health professional advice to reduce sodium intake compared with those without hypertension (p<0.001 for all comparisons) (Table 2).
Although only 10 of the 28 survey areas were in the Southern U.S. Census Region,* most of the survey areas with the highest proportions of respondents reporting taking action to reduce sodium intake and most of those with the highest proportion of respondents reporting having received advice from a health professional to reduce sodium intake were in the South. Eight of 10 states in the South were in the top two quartiles for taking action; the two that were not in the top two quartiles were West Virginia and Kentucky (Figure 1). All 10 states in the South were in the top two quartiles for receiving advice. The other four survey areas in the top half were Connecticut, New Jersey, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico (Figure 2).
Discussion
In 2013, across 26 states, DC, and Puerto Rico, the proportion of respondents who reported both taking action and receiving advice to reduce sodium intake varied, with generally higher proportions in states in the Southern U.S. Census Region, Missouri, some states in the Northeastern U.S. Census Region, and Puerto Rico. Overall, approximately half of U.S. adults in participating states and territories reported taking action to reduce sodium intake, and about one in five reported receiving advice from a health professional to reduce sodium intake. Respondents with self-reported hypertension were more likely to take action and receive advice to reduce sodium intake than those without. However, among adults with self-reported hypertension, 20% (Puerto Rico) to 50% (Utah) did not report taking action to reduce sodium intake. In all but four locations (DC, Kentucky, New Jersey, and Puerto Rico), less than half of respondents reported receiving advice to reduce sodium intake. Among adults without hypertension, most did not report taking action to reduce sodium intake, and an even smaller proportion reported receiving professional advice to reduced sodium. These findings suggest an opportunity for promoting strategies to reduce sodium consumption among all adults, with and without hypertension.
This is the first report with state-level estimates of sodium intake behavior among the general population. The geographic pattern of the prevalence of taking action or receiving advice to reduce sodium intake appears to roughly correspond with the pattern of the prevalence of self-reported hypertension (5). BRFSS 2009 data indicate the prevalence of self-reported hypertension is generally higher in the Southern U.S. Census Region, plus Indiana, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island. A possible explanation for the higher prevalence of taking action and receiving health professional advice to reduce sodium intake in Connecticut and New Jersey could be proximity to New York City's (NYC) media campaign promoting sodium reduction and other NYC and state programs aimed at reducing sodium intake. For example, in April 2013, NYC launched a communication campaign for consumers to purchase lower-sodium foods.†
The finding that Puerto Rico had the highest percentage of respondents both taking action and receiving advice for sodium reduction is new. The high percentages might be related to high hypertension prevalence. Based on 2013 BRFSS data, the prevalence of self-reported hypertension in Puerto Rico was 42.3%, whereas the national prevalence was 31.4% (6).
The findings in this report are subject to at least four limitations. First, BRFSS data are self-reported and subject to recall and social desirability bias, which might overestimate or underestimate prevalence. Second, the methods used by participants to watch or reduce sodium intake were not assessed. Third, these results are not generalizable to the entire United States. Although CDC encouraged states to use the module to assess the sodium-related behavior, the reasons individual states chose to use the module is unknown. Finally, response bias is possible because BRFSS response rates were <50%. Despite these limitations, this report is the first to provide multistate data on sodium-reduction behavior among all BRFSS respondents.
The data in this report highlight the opportunity to increase the proportion of health care professionals who advise their patients to reduce sodium intake and the proportion of U.S. adults who take action to reduce sodium intake. During 2011–2012, approximately 48% of hypertension among U.S. adults was uncontrolled (7). From 2010 to 2030, total direct medical costs of cardiovascular disease are projected to triple, increasing from $273 billion to $818 billion (in 2008 U.S. dollars) (8). Reducing sodium intake by 1,200 mg daily is projected to save $18 billion in health care costs yearly (9). Health care professionals can make a difference by recommending healthy dietary patterns, such as the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (10). By expanding the use of the sodium-related behavior module, states can enhance the ability to evaluate the effects of sodium-reduction campaigns.
1Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC.
Kochanek KD, Murphy SL, Xu J, Arias E. Mortality in the United States, 2013. NCHS Data Brief, no. 178. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2014. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db178.htm.
Heidenreich PA, Trogdon JG, Khavjou OA, et al. Forecasting the future of cardiovascular disease in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2011;123:933–44.
Bibbins-Domingo K, Chertow GM, Coxson PG, et al. Projected effect of dietary salt reductions on future cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 2010;362:590–9.
Sacks FM, Svetkey LP, Vollmer WM, et al. Effects on blood pressure of reduced dietary sodium and the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet. N Engl J Med 2001;344:3–10.
* South Census region includes Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia.
National surveillance data show that current sodium intake in the United States is substantially higher than recommended. Excess sodium intake is an important risk factor for hypertension.
What is added by this report?
In 2013, among 26 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, the median prevalence of taking action to reduce sodium intake was 51%, ranging from 39% to 73%. The median prevalence of receiving health professional advice to reduce sodium intake was 22%, ranging from 14% to 41%. Although action and advice were higher among hypertensive participants across locations, 20%–50% did not report taking action, and 38%–68% reported not receiving advice to reduce sodium intake.
What are the implications for public health practice?
These data highlight the opportunity to increase the proportion of health professionals who advise their patients to reduce sodium intake and the proportion of U.S. adults who take action to reduce sodium intake.
TABLE 1. Age-adjusted percentage of adults aged =18 years who reported taking action to reduce their dietary sodium intake, by hypertension status — 26 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2013
State/Area
Overall
Self-reported hypertension
No self-reported hypertension
No.
%
(95% CI)
No.
%
(95% CI)
No.
%
(95% CI)
Arkansas
4,469
52.6
(50.3–54.9)
2,231
62.9
(57.6–67.8)
2,238
47.1
(44.4–49.8)
Connecticut
6,547
50.7
(48.8–52.6)
2,589
67.7
(62.6–72.4)
3,958
44.0
(41.9–46.2)
DC
3,990
54.8
(52.2–57.4)
1,623
70.8
(63.7–77.0)
2,367
47.8
(44.7–50.8)
Hawaii
6,992
55.8
(54.0–57.5)
2,204
63.2
(57.9–68.2)
4,788
52.8
(50.8–54.8)
Indiana
4,362
45.2
(43.3–47.3)
1,904
57.0
(51.9–62.0)
2,458
39.8
(37.5–42.1)
Iowa
7,210
45.5
(43.9–47.1)
2,889
57.7
(53.1–62.2)
4,321
40.6
(38.9–42.4)
Kansas
10,947
43.3
(42.1–44.4)
4,455
55.9
(52.5–59.1)
6,492
37.7
(36.4–39.1)
Kentucky
9,704
50.5
(48.9–52.1)
4,717
72.4
(69.0–75.6)
4,987
39.2
(37.2–41.1)
Maine
4,496
52.3
(50.3–54.4)
1,807
67.7
(61.5–73.3)
2,689
47.6
(45.2–49.9)
Maryland
11,473
52.2
(50.7–53.7)
4,907
63.7
(60.1–67.2)
6,566
46.4
(44.6–48.1)
Massachusetts
3,332
49.8
(46.5–53.2)
1,343
61.7
(50.9–71.5)
1,989
45.4
(41.7–49.1)
Minnesota
12,363
40.7
(39.2–42.3)
4,256
52.9
(48.9–56.8)
8,107
35.2
(33.3–37.1)
Mississippi
6,628
56.3
(54.4–58.1)
3,514
66.1
(61.8–70.1)
3,114
48.6
(46.2–50.9)
Missouri
5,478
51.2
(48.9–53.5)
2,527
58.6
(53.3–63.6)
2,951
46.9
(44.2–49.6)
Montana
4,517
44.9
(42.9–46.9)
1,706
55.3
(50.0–60.6)
2,811
40.0
(37.7–42.3)
Nebraska
7,667
44.8
(43.0–46.6)
3,095
56.2
(51.4–61.0)
4,572
39.5
(37.4–41.5)
New Jersey
3,700
59.3
(56.8–61.8)
1,365
71.9
(63.6–79.0)
2,335
54.5
(51.5–57.3)
North Carolina
3,824
58.2
(56.1–60.4)
1,749
70.8
(65.2–75.8)
2,075
53.2
(50.6–55.8)
North Dakota
6,932
45.7
(44.0–47.3)
2,583
60.7
(55.2–65.9)
4,349
40.4
(38.5–42.3)
Ohio
7,138
46.0
(44.3–47.7)
3,078
56.8
(52.5–61.0)
4,060
40.0
(38.0–42.1)
Oklahoma
3,846
51.8
(49.6–53.9)
1,808
59.8
(54.4–65.0)
2,038
46.9
(44.3–49.4)
Tennessee
4,771
53.8
(51.7–55.9)
2,343
63.3
(56.9–69.3)
2,428
47.3
(44.7–50.0)
Utah
5,997
38.8
(37.3–40.2)
1,854
49.6
(45.3–54.0)
4,143
34.8
(33.1–36.5)
Virginia
7,045
55.2
(53.6–56.8)
2,859
67.9
(64.0–71.6)
4,186
49.1
(47.2–51.0)
Washington
9,918
49.0
(47.6–50.4)
3,888
60.2
(56.4–63.9)
6,030
42.6
(42.0–45.2)
West Virginia
5,578
43.4
(41.8–45.1)
2,619
56.5
(52.8–60.2)
2,959
35.9
(34.0–37.9)
Wisconsin
5,360
44.3
(42.1–46.5)
2,174
60.1
(54.0–65.9)
3,186
37.0
(34.5–39.7)
Puerto Rico
5,783
73.4
(71.8–74.9)
2,896
80.0
(76.6–83.0)
2,887
70.0
(67.9–72.0)
Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; DC = District of Columbia.
FIGURE 1. Age-adjusted percentage of adults aged =18 years who reported taking action to reduce their dietary sodium intake — 26 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2013
Alternate Text: The figure above is a map showing the age-adjusted percentage of adults aged =18 years who reported taking action to reduce their dietary sodium intake in 26 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico during 2013.
TABLE 2. Age-adjusted percentage of adults aged =18 years who reported being advised by a health professional to reduce dietary sodium intake, by hypertension status — 26 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2013
State/Area
Overall
Self-reported hypertension
No self-reported hypertension
No.
%
(95% CI)
No.
%
(95% CI)
No.
%
(95% CI)
Arkansas
4,475
22.6
(20.8–24.4)
2,225
44.5
(39.6–49.5)
2,250
10.7
(9.1–12.6)
Connecticut
6,551
21.7
(20.2–23.2)
2,586
49.9
(44.9–55.0)
3,965
10.9
(9.5–12.5)
DC
3,996
27.4
(25.3–29.6)
1,622
60.7
(53.8–67.2)
2,374
13.3
(11.4–15.5)
Hawaii
6,977
24.3
(22.8–25.8)
2,195
49.1
(44.6–53.7)
4,782
14.8
(13.4–16.4)
Indiana
4,360
20.5
(19.1–22.0)
1,898
40.5
(36.3–44.9)
2,462
9.8
(8.5–11.3)
Iowa
7,186
17.8
(16.7–19.0)
2,874
40.4
(36.2–44.7)
4,312
8.9
(7.9–10.1)
Kansas
10,932
17.0
(16.2–17.8)
4,428
37.1
(34.0–40.3)
6,504
7.9
(7.2–8.7)
Kentucky
9,677
28.2
(26.9–29.5)
4,689
60.3
(56.5–63.9)
4,988
10.1
(9.0–11.3)
Maine
4,490
19.3
(17.8–20.8)
1,794
45.8
(39.7–52.0)
2,696
9.1
(7.9–10.6)
Maryland
11,489
23.8
(22.6–25.0)
4,898
48.5
(44.7–52.4)
6,591
12.4
(11.2–13.6)
Massachusetts
3,323
18.1
(16.1–20.3)
1,336
37.8
(31.4–44.7)
1,987
9.2
(7.4–11.5)
Minnesota
12,398
13.5
(12.4–14.6)
4,249
31.7
(28.0–35.7)
8,149
7.0
(6.0–8.2)
Mississippi
6,610
27.0
(25.5–28.5)
3,503
49.3
(45.0–53.5)
3,107
12.6
(11.1–14.2)
Missouri
5,457
19.8
(18.3–21.4)
2,502
45.0
(39.2–51.0)
2,955
9.9
(8.5–11.4)
Montana
4,508
13.8
(12.5–15.1)
1,693
33.3
(28.1–38.8)
2,815
6.2
(5.2–7.3)
Nebraska
7,660
17.1
(15.9–18.3)
3,086
35.1
(31.0–39.5)
4,574
8.5
(7.4–9.7)
New Jersey
3,715
23.5
(21.6–25.5)
1,359
50.5
(42.8–58.2)
2,356
12.5
(10.7–14.6)
North Carolina
3,808
24.1
(22.4–25.8)
1,735
47.1
(41.9–52.4)
2,073
12.3
(10.7–14.0)
North Dakota
6,941
15.1
(14.1–16.2)
2,569
36.6
(31.9–41.5)
4,372
6.5
(5.6–7.5)
Ohio
7,160
20.2
(18.9–21.5)
3,076
40.9
(37.0–44.9)
4,084
9.8
(8.6–11.2)
Oklahoma
3,835
22.6
(21.0–24.2)
1,798
40.3
(35.4–45.4)
2,037
12.4
(10.9–14.2)
Tennessee
4,756
23.2
(21.5–25.0)
2,329
41.9
(37.9–46.0)
2,427
11.5
(9.9–13.3)
Utah
5,988
14.5
(13.5–15.6)
1,842
35.5
(31.3–39.8)
4,146
6.7
(5.9–7.7)
Virginia
7,065
22.6
(21.4–23.9)
2,857
48.8
(45.0–52.6)
4,208
10.1
(9.0–11.2)
Washington
9,926
17.7
(16.7–18.7)
3,871
40.3
(36.6–44.1)
6,055
8.3
(7.4–9.2)
West Virginia
5,557
22.4
(21.1–23.6)
2,597
43.1
(39.4–46.9)
2,960
9.8
(8.7–11.0)
Wisconsin
5,350
18.6
(16.9–20.4)
2,169
41.4
(35.6–47.3)
3,181
8.6
(7.0–10.6)
Puerto Rico
5,781
41.4
(39.7–43.0)
2,896
61.6
(57.9–65.1)
2,885
27.2
(25.2–29.2)
Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; DC = District of Columbia.
FIGURE 2. Age-adjusted percentage of adults aged =18 years who reported being advised by a health professional to reduce dietary sodium intake — 26 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2013
Alternate Text: The figure above is a map showing age-adjusted percentage of adults aged =18 years who reported being advised by a health professional to reduce dietary sodium intake in 26 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico during 2013.