After you develop and submit your application, the CSR will assign your application to an Institute or Center (IC) at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) based on the focus and mission of the IC. When an application is assigned to NCI, a referral officer will examine and direct each application to the appropriate NCI program director. The program director is responsible for following the progress of his/her assigned application(s) through the peer review process.
Identification Numbers
Before starting the peer review process, each new application received is assigned an identification number (grant numbers) and checked for completeness.
Application Type
Activity Code
Administering Organization
Serial Number
Support Year
Suffix Code
1
R01
CA
100228
01
A1 or S1
Application Type: Indicates whether the application is new, a renewal (competing continuation), noncompeting, or other type. The example shows a new (Type 1) application.
Activity Code: Lists the type of grant that has been applied for; an (R01) is a traditional research project.
Administering Organization: A two letter abbreviation for the primary IC assigned. CA is the two digit code for NCI. The serial number is a unique five or six digit number that identifies the specific application and indicates that it is the 100,228th application assigned to the NCI.
Support Year: Indicates the current year of support. For example, the 01 shows that this is a new grant. Sometimes the support year is followed by a suffix.
Suffix Code: Starts with an "A" to indicate an amendment to the application. An A1 is the first revised or amended application. An "S" suffix code is used to show supplements. For example, an S1 is for the first supplement. See NIH Policy on Resubmission Applications.
Submission Policies
Incomplete Application Submission
Incomplete applications will not be reviewed. The NCI considers a grant application incomplete if:
It fails to follow the instructions provided on the appropriate application form
It fails to follow specific instructions provided in an RFA or PA
The material presented is insufficient to permit an adequate review
You must seek approval from the awarding IC’s program director at least six weeks prior to submission if you anticipate submitting an application exceeding $500,000 in direct costs in any year of the project.
If the requested amount is significantly greater than $500,000, you should request approval even further in advance. Applications submitted in response to RFAs or other announcements that include specific budgetary limits are exempt from this requirement.
Continuous Submission
As an incentive for outstanding service in the NIH peer review process, certain reviewers may be eligible for continuous submission. If eligible, they may submit their research grant applications (R01, R21 or R34) on a continuous basis and have those applications undergo initial peer review in a timely manner.